In a revealing testimony before Parliament’s Ad Hoc Committee, businessman Vusimuzi “Cat” Matlala laid bare the contours of his commercial career, confirming his directorship in approximately six companies while offering a glimpse into a past marked by informal hustles and a notable arrest.
The interrogation, which sought to map the financial history and interests of the witness, painted a picture of a man whose entrepreneurial journey began not in corporate boardrooms, but in the gritty, unregulated spaces of the informal economy.
The Corporate Structure: A Security Empire as the Foundation
Under questioning, Matlala confirmed that his current business portfolio consists of around six companies. He identified his first formal, and seemingly most significant, venture as a security business.
“This was the enterprise that put me on the map,” Matlala stated, explaining that the company specialized in providing security services to construction sites. This niche focus, he suggested, allowed him to secure a steady stream of clients in a high-risk industry, laying the financial groundwork for his subsequent corporate endeavours. The other companies in his stable were not detailed, but their existence points to a deliberate strategy of business diversification from this core security foundation.
A Past of “Informal” Enterprise and a Criminal Record
However, the committee’s probing unearthed a history that predates his legitimate security enterprise. Matlala candidly admitted that before establishing the security company, he operated “a few informal businesses.”
The term “informal” often serves as a euphemism for ventures operating outside the bounds of formal regulation and taxation, and Matlala did not shy away from the legal consequences of this period. In a moment that heightened the tension in the committee room, he confirmed a past arrest in the early 2000s.
The charge, as he presented it, was for “buying illegal stuff.” He deliberately left the nature of these goods unspecified, a strategic vagueness that hung in the air and raised more questions than it answered. Was it stolen property, illicit goods, or contraband? This admission of a criminal record, albeit from decades ago, adds a complex layer to his profile, suggesting a transition from the periphery of the law to a position of a formal business director.
The Man Behind the Moniker: “Cat” and Family Life
In a lighter, more personal interlude, the committee sought to understand the man behind the formidable reputation. Matlala was asked to explain his ubiquitous nickname, “Cat.”
With a measured tone, he revealed the nickname’s origin is tied directly to his personal life. “The name ‘Cat’ stems from me being born into a family of nine children,” he explained, drawing a picture of a large, bustling household where such monikers often stick. He further solidified his image as a family man, confirming that he is married.
This personal revelation served to humanize the witness, creating a stark contrast between the informal trader with a criminal past, the security company director of the present, and the private family man. It completed a more nuanced portrait of a figure whose journey from the informal economy to a multi-company director reflects a complex, and perhaps not uncommon, South African entrepreneurial narrative.
The committee is expected to continue its inquiry, with Matlala’s testimony providing crucial pieces to the larger puzzle it is attempting to solve.



