In a bold and unconventional intervention aimed at tackling one of KwaZulu-Natal’s most persistent and deadly governance crises, MEC for Transport and Human Settlements Siboniso Duma has proposed a truth-and-reconciliation-style process to expose and clean up widespread corruption in the province’s driver’s licence testing system. The proposal, which Duma described as a “necessary last resort,” would offer a form of amnesty to individuals who obtained their driver’s licences fraudulently—provided they come forward voluntarily and assist authorities in identifying corrupt driving school operators, testing centre officials, and syndicate kingpins.
Speaking at a provincial road safety summit held in Pietermaritzburg on Monday morning, Duma did not mince words. He described KwaZulu-Natal’s driver’s licence regime as “rotten to the core,” alleging that an estimated 60% of all driver’s licences issued in the province over the past decade were obtained through bribery, forgery, or the infamous “licence on demand” system—where applicants pay a fee (typically between R1,500 and R5,000) to bypass both the written learner’s test and the practical driving examination.
“The blood of innocent people is on the hands of those who sell licences,” Duma told a hushed auditorium of traffic officials, civil society representatives, and road safety advocates. “Every time an unqualified driver causes a crash—every time a mother loses a child, a husband loses a wife, a community loses a breadwinner—that death is a direct consequence of corruption in our licensing system. We cannot continue pretending that this is a small problem. It is an epidemic. And epidemics require extraordinary measures.”
The Scale of the Problem: A Crisis of Incompetence on KZN’s Roads
Duma’s proposal did not emerge from a vacuum. It follows months of investigations by the provincial Department of Transport, the Hawks, and the Road Traffic Management Corporation (RTMC) into allegations of systematic fraud at driver’s licence testing centres (DLTCs) across KwaZulu-Natal.
According to a confidential RTMC report leaked to the media in late 2025, investigators found evidence of widespread corruption at 17 of the province’s 52 DLTCs, with the worst offenders located in Durban, Pietermaritzburg, Richards Bay, and several rural districts. The report alleged that:
- Licence examiners were accepting bribes ranging from R800 to R3,000 to “pass” applicants without conducting any practical test.
- Driving school operators were acting as middlemen, collecting payments from applicants and distributing bribes to testing centre staff.
- Fictitious learner’s licences were being generated using compromised government computers, allowing unqualified drivers to skip the written test entirely.
- Foreign nationals (particularly from Zimbabwe, Mozambique, and Malawi) were being charged inflated fees—up to R8,000—for licences that were never entered into the national eNATIS database, rendering them invisible to traffic officers.
The human consequences of this corruption are measurable. In 2025, KwaZulu-Natal recorded 12,487 road crashes, resulting in 3,892 fatalities—the highest death toll of any province for the fourth consecutive year. Of those fatal crashes, the RTMC estimates that nearly 30% involved drivers who either had fraudulent licences or no licences at all.
“I have seen the dockets,” Duma said, his voice rising with emotion. “I have read the accident reports. A minibus taxi overturns on the R74 because the driver never learned how to brake on a curve. A truck jackknifes on the N3 because the driver never learned how to downshift on a downhill grade. A young woman dies at a robot because the man behind the wheel bought his licence for two thousand rand and never learned what a red light means. This is not a statistical problem. This is a slaughter.”
The Proposed Model: A ‘Cleansing’ Process Inspired by the TRC
The truth-and-reconciliation model Duma outlined is loosely inspired by South Africa’s post-apartheid Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), which offered amnesty to individuals who fully disclosed their political crimes during the apartheid era. Under Duma’s proposal, a similar framework would apply to driver’s licence corruption—with some important modifications.
Phase 1: Voluntary Disclosure (3 months)
Individuals who obtained their driver’s licences through fraudulent means—whether by paying a bribe, using a proxy test-taker, or presenting forged documents—would be given a 90-day window to voluntarily come forward to a specially established “Licensing Integrity Commission.” Those who disclose would not face criminal prosecution for the original fraud. Instead, they would be required to surrender their fraudulent licence and re-sit both the learner’s and practical driving tests at their own expense.
“We are not looking to fill our prisons with people who made a bad choice,” Duma explained. “We are looking to get unqualified drivers off the road and give them a second chance to become qualified—legitimately. If you come forward, we will not arrest you. We will not fine you. We will simply say: ‘Thank you for your honesty. Now go and learn to drive properly.'”
Phase 2: Syndicate Disclosure (6 months)
Individuals who can provide credible, actionable information about corrupt driving school operators, testing centre officials, or syndicate leaders would be offered an additional incentive: complete immunity from any civil or criminal liability related to their own licence fraud, plus a financial reward of up to R20,000 for information that leads to a successful prosecution.
“At the heart of this system are not the individuals who bought licences—as wrong as that is,” Duma said. “At the heart of this system are the criminals who sell them. The examiners who take bribes. The managers who look the other way. The syndicate bosses who have turned this into a multi-million-rand industry. We want them. And we are willing to pay for information that helps us put them behind bars.”
Phase 3: Enforcement and Prosecution (Ongoing)
After the 90-day amnesty window closes, the provincial Department of Transport would launch a comprehensive enforcement campaign, cross-referencing the eNATIS database with driving school records, test centre logs, and informant testimony. Those found to possess fraudulent licences who did not come forward voluntarily would face criminal charges, including fraud (maximum 15 years), corruption (maximum 18 years), and—in cases where a fraudulent driver caused a fatal crash—culpable homicide (maximum 10 years) or even murder, if intent can be proven.
“We will give you a chance to do the right thing,” Duma said. “But if you choose to remain silent, if you choose to keep driving on a licence you did not earn, and if we find you—and we will find you—then the full weight of the law will fall upon you. No mercy. No second chances. No plea bargains.”
Reactions: Praise, Skepticism, and Practical Concerns
Duma’s proposal has generated a firestorm of reaction from across the political, legal, and road safety spectrum.
Civil Society and Road Safety Advocates:
The South African Road Federation (SARF) welcomed the proposal as “innovative and necessary.” “We have been calling for radical action on licence corruption for years,” said SARF CEO Vusi Mkhize. “The traditional approach—occasional sting operations, the arrest of a few examiners, the occasional prosecution—has failed. The problem is too big, too entrenched. A truth-and-reconciliation model offers a way to break the logjam and get unqualified drivers off the road without overwhelming the criminal justice system.”
However, some advocates expressed concern that amnesty could be seen as “rewarding criminals.” “There is a moral hazard here,” said advocate Thandeka Mthembu of the Road Safety Justice Campaign. “If you bought a licence, you knowingly endangered every other road user. You should face consequences. I understand the pragmatic argument for amnesty, but we must be careful not to send a message that corruption has no cost.”
Driving School Industry:
The South African Driving Schools Association (SADSA) issued a cautiously supportive statement. “Our members who operate legitimately have been losing business for years to corrupt operators who promise ‘guaranteed passes’ to applicants,” said SADSA chairperson Mpho Letlape. “If Duma’s plan can shut down those corrupt operators, we are all for it. But we need to see the details. How will the amnesty process work? How will we prevent corrupt examiners from simply moving to another testing centre? The devil is in the implementation.”
Legal Experts:
Constitutional law experts have raised questions about the legality of offering amnesty for crimes that have already been committed. “The National Prosecuting Authority has the sole constitutional power to decide whether to prosecute,” said Professor James Grant of the University of the Witwatersrand. “A provincial MEC cannot unilaterally grant immunity from prosecution. Duma would need the cooperation of the NPA and the Minister of Justice. That is not impossible, but it is a significant hurdle.”
Others noted that the TRC model was specifically designed for political crimes committed under a previous regime, not for ordinary criminal corruption. “There are important legal distinctions,” said advocate Paul Hoffman of the Institute for Accountability in Southern Africa. “That said, there is nothing stopping the NPA from entering into plea agreements or declining to prosecute in exchange for cooperation. The framework exists. It just needs to be applied creatively.”
The National Department of Transport:
In a brief statement, national Transport Minister Sindisiwe Chikunga’s office said it had “taken note” of Duma’s proposal and would “engage with the KZN MEC to explore legally viable options.” The statement did not endorse or reject the proposal, reflecting the political sensitivity of the issue.
Political Opposition:
The Democratic Alliance (DA) in KwaZulu-Natal dismissed the proposal as “political theater.” “Siboniso Duma has been MEC for Transport for two years,” said DA provincial spokesperson on transport Sharon Hoosen. “In that time, corruption in the licensing system has only gotten worse. Now, on the eve of local government elections, he announces a ‘bold plan’ that he knows will never be implemented. This is not leadership. This is desperation.”
The Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) went further, accusing Duma of “protecting corrupt ANC comrades” who own driving schools. “This is a smokescreen,” said EFF provincial leader Nkululeko Dunga. “The ANC has been in power for 32 years. The corruption in the licensing system happened on their watch. And now they want to offer amnesty to the very people who benefited from their corruption? No. Arrest them all. Prosecute them all. No deals.”
Practical Challenges: Implementation Hurdles
Even if Duma secures the necessary legal and political support, implementing the truth-and-reconciliation model will face significant practical hurdles.
Database Integrity:
The eNATIS database—the national register of all licensed drivers—is notoriously unreliable. A 2024 audit by the Auditor-General found that over 800,000 driver’s licence records in the system contained errors, duplications, or missing data. Without a clean database, identifying fraudulent licences is a monumental task.
“We cannot offer amnesty to people we cannot identify,” Duma acknowledged. “That is why the first phase of the plan is voluntary disclosure. We are counting on people’s conscience—and their fear of being caught later—to bring them forward. But we are also working with the RTMC to clean up eNATIS. That work is already underway.”
Capacity of Testing Centres:
If tens of thousands of drivers voluntarily surrender their fraudulent licences and re-sit their tests, the province’s already overstretched DLTCs will face a massive surge in demand. KZN currently has only 52 testing centres, many of which lack sufficient examiners, vehicles, or computer terminals.
“We will need to expand capacity significantly,” Duma said. “That means hiring more examiners, opening temporary testing centres in high-demand areas, and extending operating hours. It will cost money. But it will cost less than burying the victims of unqualified drivers.”
Risk of False Disclosures:
The offer of financial rewards for information about syndicates could encourage false or malicious accusations. The proposed Licensing Integrity Commission would need robust mechanisms to verify information before acting on it—and to penalize those who make false reports.
“We are aware of the risks,” Duma said. “That is why we will require corroborating evidence—bank records, witness testimony, documentary proof—before any reward is paid. We will not pay out based on anonymous tips or unsupported allegations.”
The Human Face of Licence Corruption
To illustrate the stakes, Duma concluded his summit address by introducing a woman seated in the front row: Nomsa Dlamini, 34, whose 19-year-old daughter, Thando, was killed in 2023 when a driver with a fraudulent licence ran a red light in Umhlanga.
“I have nothing against the man who killed my daughter,” Dlamini said, her voice barely above a whisper. “He was also a victim. He paid R2,000 for his licence. He was told it was real. He believed he could drive. But on that day, when the light turned red, he did not know what to do. He panicked. He accelerated. And my daughter died.”
Dlamini turned to face the audience of traffic officials and politicians. “I do not want revenge. I want change. I want no other mother to get the call I got. If this truth-and-reconciliation plan can save even one life, then it is worth it. Please. Do not let politics kill this idea. Do not let bureaucracy bury it. My daughter is gone. But other daughters can still be saved.”
The room fell silent. Several officials wiped their eyes.
What Comes Next: A Roadmap to Implementation
Duma announced that a formal proposal would be submitted to the KZN Provincial Cabinet within 30 days. If approved at the provincial level, the proposal would then be sent to the national Minister of Transport and the National Prosecuting Authority for legal clearance. Duma expressed hope that the amnesty window could open as early as September 2026.
In the meantime, the provincial Department of Transport will launch a public awareness campaign—titled “Drive Clean, Live Clean” —to educate drivers about the proposal and encourage voluntary disclosure.
“We are not naive,” Duma said in his closing remarks. “We know that corruption does not disappear overnight. We know that some people will hate this idea. We know that some will call it weak, or unworkable, or unconstitutional. But we also know that doing nothing is not an option. Doing nothing means more crashes. More funerals. More families destroyed. I refuse to do nothing. I ask every South African who has lost someone to a road crash: stand with us. Help us end this madness.”
As the summit concluded, Duma walked over to Nomsa Dlamini, embraced her, and whispered something in her ear. She nodded, tears streaming down her face.
Outside the Pietermaritzburg conference centre, the traffic on the N3 flowed past—drivers commuting home, taxi operators ferrying passengers, trucks hauling goods. Among them, no one knows how many are driving on licences they never earned. But if Duma has his way, that number is about to shrink—one confession, one test, one life at a time.
About The Author
