In a bid to quell growing public anxiety and dispel what he termed “alarmist misinformation,” Health Minister Dr Aaron Motsoaledi has moved to reassure millions of South African women and girls that the sanitary pads and panty liners available on local shelves are safe for use. The Minister’s statement, delivered at a press briefing in Cape Town, directly addresses recent concerns over the presence of endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) in menstrual products, confirming that the trace amounts detected do not constitute a genuine health risk.
The controversy erupted following the publication of a study, and subsequent social media firestorm, that highlighted the detection of various chemicals—including volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and phthalates—in some sanitary products. These substances, which can interfere with the body’s hormonal systems, have been linked in high-dose animal studies to reproductive issues and other health problems, sparking fear among consumers who use these products monthly.
However, Dr Motsoaledi was unequivocal in his assessment, urging the public to rely on science rather than fear.
“Let me be very clear: there is no cause for panic, and there is no reason for any woman or girl to stop using sanitary pads based on the information currently available,” Motsoaledi stated. “The simple fact of the matter is that these chemicals are present in such infinitesimally small quantities that they do not pose a real danger to human health. We are talking about parts per billion. The human body is remarkably resilient, and the dose, as toxicologists have known for centuries, makes the poison.”
The Science Behind the Statement
Motsoaledi’s assurance is rooted in the fundamental principle of toxicology: the dose makes the poison. While certain chemicals found in adhesives, absorbent gels, and fragrances used in sanitary products can be harmful at high levels of exposure, the levels detected in sanitary pads are minuscule.
The Minister explained that the National Department of Health, in collaboration with the South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAHPRA) and the National Institute for Occupational Health (NIOH), had conducted a thorough review of the available evidence, including international studies and local product testing.
“We have looked at the data. We have consulted with experts in endocrinology, toxicology, and gynecology,” he said. “The consensus is clear: the trace amounts of these chemicals found in sanitary pads are far below any threshold that would cause biological harm. The benefits of using clean, hygienic sanitary products—preventing infection and enabling women and girls to go to school and work with dignity—far outweigh any hypothetical, unproven risk from these trace elements.”
Addressing the ‘Toxic Shock’ Headlines
The Minister specifically took aim at what he described as irresponsible reporting and social media scaremongering that led some to believe that using pads could lead to “toxic shock” or hormonal imbalances.
“Social media can be a wonderful tool, but it can also be a vehicle for spreading fear without facts,” Motsoaledi said. “I saw headlines comparing using a pad to smoking a pack of cigarettes a day. This is not just wrong; it is dangerous nonsense. It creates anxiety where none should exist.”
He acknowledged that the ideal scenario would be products completely free of any synthetic chemicals. However, he noted that even “chemical-free” or “organic” alternatives often contain natural compounds that, in concentrated forms, can also cause allergic reactions in sensitive individuals.
A Call for Better Regulation, Not Boycotts
While dismissing the immediate health risks, Motsoaledi did not entirely dismiss the underlying concerns about product safety and transparency. He announced that the Department of Health would be engaging with manufacturers and retailers to strengthen labeling requirements, allowing consumers to make more informed choices.
“We are not saying the status quo is perfect,” he conceded. “We are saying there is no emergency. However, we believe in continuous improvement. We will be engaging with industry to ensure that consumers are better informed about what is in the products they use. We will also be looking at international best practices for regulating these products, which are currently classified as general goods rather than medical devices in many jurisdictions.”
Stakeholders React: Relief and Caution
The Minister’s statement was met with a mix of relief and cautious acceptance from various quarters.
The South African Feminist Collective (SAFC) issued a statement acknowledging the government’s effort to address the concerns but calling for continued vigilance. “We appreciate the Minister’s clarification, but we will continue to advocate for stricter regulation and more research into the long-term, cumulative effects of exposure to multiple chemical sources,” the group said. “Women’s health should not be a secondary concern.”
The Consumer Goods Council of South Africa (CGCSA) welcomed the Minister’s findings, stating that local and international manufacturers adhere to strict safety standards. “The health and safety of consumers is the absolute priority for our members,” said a council spokesperson. “We are confident in the safety of our products and welcome the Department’s commitment to a constructive dialogue on transparency.”
The Bottom Line
For the average South African woman, Dr Motsoaledi’s message was simple: do not be afraid. “Use the products you need to use. Do not let unfounded fear on the internet stop you from managing your menstrual health with dignity and safety. We will continue to monitor the science, and if anything changes, we will be the first to tell you. But for now, rest assured, you are safe.”
About The Author
