In an era where flying often feels like a cattle-class chore of cramped seats and costly extras, a surprising social media sensation is brewing—one with a distinctly South African flavor. A seemingly simple X (formerly Twitter) post by user Shezi, tagging President Cyril Ramaphosa, has ignited a national conversation not about politics, but about pretzels, protein bars, and patriotism in the sky.
“Took @flysaa today,” Shezi began, sharing a snapshot of a full bottle of water, a premium-looking protein bar, and a spacious-looking economy seat. “The little things make a difference. Full water bottle, decent snack, comfortable seat. Felt like a proper service again. Well done.” This digital nod to national pride has since ballooned into a sprawling, heartwarming thread, with hundreds of South Africans enthusiastically sharing their own tales of unexpectedly delightful domestic flights.
The anecdotes are vivid and mouthwatering. Travelers recount being served “bistro-quality oxtail” on a 90-minute hop from Johannesburg to Cape Town, a far cry from the standard packet of peanuts. Others praise the “magic cool box” in the galley stocked with complimentary beers and ciders, with cabin crew generously offering “as many as you like” to ease the journey. The overall sentiment is one of rediscovered comfort and a touch of old-world grace: spacious legroom, friendly and attentive staff, and a tangible sense of pride from employees who seem genuinely invested in the airline’s comeback story.
This groundswell of public affection is not happening in a vacuum. It is a crucial, emotional chapter in the fraught saga of South African Airways (SAA), which entered a form of bankruptcy protection in 2019 and has since consumed over R50 billion in state bailouts to stay aloft. Under its new ownership, the Takatso Consortium deal having recently collapsed, SAA is a phoenix still very much in the process of rising. Its current fleet of 20 aircraft serves 15 regional destinations, with a reported revenue of R7 billion in its last financial year. Yet, that figure is shadowed by a sobering R354 million net loss, largely attributed to the relentless surge in global fuel prices.
The online celebration, therefore, exists in a state of poignant tension. On one side are the ardent defenders of SAA’s revival, who see each full water bottle and complimentary snack as a symbol of a national asset worth saving. They book SAA first, citing the “special domestic touch” and a desire to support a proudly South African brand finding its feet. “It feels like our airline again,” one commenter wrote, a sentiment echoed by many.
On the other side, a pragmatic chorus points to the fierce competition from lean, punctual, and profitable low-cost carriers like FlySafair. Critics argue that while oxtail and endless beers are lovely, long-term survival depends on ruthless operational efficiency, consistent on-time performance, and a clear path to profitability that does not rely on the public purse. The R354 million loss is a stark reminder that customer goodwill, while invaluable, cannot alone fuel an airline.
The phenomenon highlights a fascinating duality in the public’s relationship with SAA. It is an airline simultaneously viewed as a beleaguered state-owned enterprise requiring fiscal discipline, and as a beloved national emblem whose service quality evokes a deep-seated, almost nostalgic, pride. The social media buzz is a powerful, unsolicited marketing windfall—a demonstration that in its quest for commercial sustainability, SAA has successfully tapped into an emotional reservoir of public support by simply getting the “little things” right.
Whether this translates into a sustainable business model remains the billion-rand question. But for now, as travelers continue to post pictures of their meals and toast with complimentary drinks at 30,000 feet, SAA is enjoying something perhaps as vital as immediate profit in its long journey back: the fervent belief of its passengers that it is, once again, worth flying.Last updated 2 hours ago
About The Author
