The chalkboard at Siyakhula Secondary School is clean. Not because the morning’s lessons have been erased in preparation for the next period, but because there were no lessons to erase. It has been this way since Mr. Dlamini packed his meager belongings into a hired taxi and drove east, toward the city, toward a salary that could actually sustain a family. That was eighteen months ago. The chalkboard has remained, for all intents and purposes, blank.
Siyakhula is one of 435 public schools across South Africa that, in 2024, did not offer pure Mathematics to their Grade 12 learners. Not because the learners lacked aptitude. Not because the curriculum was deemed too demanding. But because there was no one to teach it.
The release of this statistic by the Department of Basic Education has ignited a national reckoning with an uncomfortable truth: in democratic South Africa, thirty-one years into freedom, a child’s postal code remains the single greatest predictor of whether they will ever have the opportunity to become an engineer, a doctor, or a scientist.
ruits mathematics graduates away from the very communities that need them most.”
The numbers bear this out. South African universities produce approximately 2,000 mathematics graduates annually. Fewer than 15% enter the teaching profession. The rest are absorbed by banks, insurance companies, technology firms, and consulting houses—industries that offer starting salaries the education system cannot hope to match.
“We are training our best mathematical minds to calculate risk and optimize profits,” Fleisch observes, “while our rural classrooms are staffed by well-meaning volunteers who cannot solve a quadratic equation.”
The Literacy Trap
At the center of the storm stands Mathematical Literacy, the controversial subject that was introduced in 2006 as an alternative pathway for learners who struggled with pure Mathematics. The intention, its architects maintain, was never to create a permanent underclass. It was to provide a meaningful mathematical education for the majority of learners who would not pursue calculus-dependent careers.
Eighteen years later, the evidence of unintended consequences is overwhelming.
Learners who complete Grade 12 with Mathematical Literacy are statutorily barred from university admission to engineering, medicine, computer science, architecture, pharmacy, veterinary science, and most physical science degree programmes. They cannot study actuarial science. They cannot pursue data science. In many institutions, they cannot even access economics or commerce degrees without completing expensive, time-consuming bridging courses.
“It is not literacy. It is a lid,” says Professor Mamokgethi Phakeng, the former Vice-Chancellor of the University of Cape Town and one of the country’s most distinguished mathematics educators. “We have created a system that sorts children at fifteen—fifteen!—into those who are worthy of a STEM career and those who are not. And this sorting is not based on ability. It is based entirely on whether their school happens to have a qualified mathematics teacher.”
Phakeng’s intervention in the ongoing policy debate has been characteristically direct. “Mathematical Literacy was sold to us as inclusion. It has become the most effective exclusion mechanism we have ever devised.”the promise we made in 1994.”
The proposal has been met with cautious optimism from civil society organizations and qualified skepticism from teacher unions. The National Professional Teachers’ Organisation of South Africa (NAPTOSA) has warned that mandating Mathematics without addressing the underlying teacher shortage will simply produce mass failure.
“You cannot teach a subject without teachers,” says NAPTOSA executive director Basil Manuel. “The minister is proposing to require Mathematics in every school. We agree with the principle. But where are the mathematics teachers for those 435 schools going to come from? They do not exist. We have not trained them. We have not retained them. We cannot conjure them out of thin air.”
The Rural Penalty
To understand why mathematics teachers do not exist in rural South Africa, one need only examine the vacancy list maintained by the Eastern Cape Department of Education. It runs to forty-seven pages. It includes positions that have been advertised, readvertised, and advertised again, drawing no qualified applicants.
“I applied to every rural school in my province when I graduated,” says Nomfundo Mbatha, who completed her Bachelor of Science in Applied Mathematics at the University of KwaZulu-Natal in 2022. “I wanted to teach. I believed in the difference I could make. But the package they offered—R26,000 per month, no housing allowance, no relocation assistance, no support for my husband to find employment—it was not enough. It was never enough.”
Mbatha now works as a data analyst at a Durban-based financial services firm. She earns R48,000 per month, plus annual bonuses and comprehensive benefits. She thinks about the rural classrooms she might have occupied. She does not regret her decision.
“I made the rational choice,” she says. “The system expects teachers to be martyrs. I was not willing to be a martyr.”
The Learners Left Behind
At Siyakhula Secondary, the Grade 12 learners have developed their own coping mechanisms. They share textbooks, three to a copy. They watch YouTube tutorials on a single smartphone, passed from hand to hand during breaks. They attempt past examination papers, comparing answers, arguing about methods, teaching one another in the absence of anyone qualified to teach them.
“We try,” says Thabo Mthembu, the head boy. “We know that without mathematics, there is no university. There is no bursary. There is no way out of this village. So we try.”
But trying, his teachers acknowledge, is not enough. The gap between what the learners need to know and what they can teach themselves is not a gap at all. It is a chasm.
“I had a learner last year who wanted to study medicine,” the principal recalls. “She was brilliant. She taught herself trigonometry from a textbook her uncle sent from Johannesburg. She sat for the final examination. She achieved 38%.”
He pauses. “She is working at the supermarket in Kokstad now. She sends money home when she can. She does not speak about medicine anymore.”
The Cost of Inaction
Economists have attempted to quantify the damage. One frequently cited study estimates that the mathematics teacher shortage costs the South African economy approximately R30 billion annually in lost productivity, reduced innovation, and constrained economic growth. The figure is necessarily imprecise, reliant on assumptions about how many potential engineers and scientists the system fails to produce.
But the human cost resists quantification. It is measured in deferred dreams and abandoned ambitions. In the teenager who realizes, too late, that the subject choice she made at fifteen has permanently foreclosed her chosen career. In the university student who spends three years in bridging courses, accumulating debt, attempting to access the programme that should have been available to her directly from matric. In the young man who wanted to be a pilot but now drives a taxi, watching planes cross the sky above the N2 highway.
“We are bleeding talent,” says Phakeng. “Every year, we lose an entire cohort of potential scientists, engineers, and doctors. Not because they lack ability. Because we lack the will to ensure that every child, regardless of where they are born, has access to a qualified mathematics teacher.”
The Road Ahead
The department’s 2026 deadline looms. Between now and then, officials must confront questions that have resisted resolution for three decades. How do you incentivize mathematics graduates to teach in rural schools? How do you retrofit a curriculum that has, however unintentionally, institutionalized inequality? How do you convince a generation of learners, already socialized to believe that mathematics is not for them, that the door is not actually closed?
There are no easy answers. There are only the 435 schools, the 62,873 learners, the empty chalkboards waiting for teachers who may never arrive.
At Siyakhula, the afternoon bell has rung. The learners gather their belongings and drift toward the taxi rank, toward the dusty footpaths that wind between homesteads, toward the evening meals and the homework they will attempt without assistance. The substitute teacher, Nosipho, remains in the classroom. She is reading the Euclidean geometry chapter again, tracing the diagrams with her finger, trying to understand.
She does not know if she will be employed next term. The school’s governing body meets on Thursday to discuss the budget. There may be funds for a proper teacher. There may not be.
“I hope,” she says, “that they find someone qualified. These children deserve more than I can give them.”
Outside, under the jacaranda tree, the learners wait for their transport. They do not discuss mathematics. They discuss the matric dance, the upcoming soccer match, the friend who has found work in Cape Town. They do not discuss the future. The future, for young people in rural South Africa, has always been an abstraction—something that happens elsewhere, to other people, in cities they have never visited.
The planes continue to cross the sky above them. The chalkboard remains clean. And 435 schools wait, as they have waited for generations, for a mathematics teacher who may never come.
About The Author
