In a procedural move with significant strategic implications, the Judicial Commission of Inquiry into Criminality, Political Interference, and Corruption in the Criminal Justice System (the Madlanga Commission) has granted North West businessman and senior ANC provincial leader Suliman Carrim a postponement of his highly anticipated testimony. Carrim, whose name has surfaced repeatedly in connection with allegations of tender manipulation and political-criminal nexus, will now appear on March 9th and 10th, having been excused from his scheduled appearance today.
The decision, confirmed by Commission Secretary Advocate Vuyani Ngalwana, followed an urgent application by Carrim’s legal team led by veteran attorney Mpho Phasha. The lawyers successfully argued that they had only recently received a substantial volume of documentary evidence from the Commission’s evidence leaders and required adequate time to review it with their client to ensure a fair and thorough response.
“The Commission has a duty to balance the public interest in expeditious proceedings with the fundamental right of every witness to prepare properly,” said a commission official on background. “Given the volume and complexity of the documentation, which forms the basis of the intended questioning, a short postponement was deemed reasonable to ensure the integrity of the process.”
A Witness at the Crux of Multiple Allegations
Suliman Carrim is not a peripheral figure in the Commission’s sprawling investigation. His expected testimony is seen as a potential watershed moment, as he occupies a unique intersection of politics, business, and the allegations at the heart of the inquiry. Prior witnesses and leaked documents have implicated Carrim in several key strands of the Commission’s work:
- State Tender Irregularities: He has been linked to multiple lucrative contracts in the North West province, particularly in health, transport, and infrastructure, where processes were allegedly manipulated to benefit his companies.
- Political Gatekeeping: In his role as a senior ANC official in the province, Carrim has been described in prior testimony as a key “facilitator” or “fixer,” allegedly using political influence to sway administrative decisions, protect certain business interests, and intimidate opponents.
- Alleged Criminal Nexus: Perhaps most critically, evidence leaders have hinted at possible links between Carrim’s business operations and individuals already named as alleged figures in organized crime syndicates operating in the mining and security sectors. His testimony is expected to probe the nature of these relationships and financial flows.
Strategic Manoeuvre or Genuine Need?
The postponement has been met with mixed reactions. Critics, including representatives of civil society organizations observing the commission, suggest it is a tactical delay.
“This is a classic strategy,” said a legal analyst familiar with commission processes. “It allows the witness and his team to study the commission’s hand—to see exactly what evidence they have and how they plan to use it. It provides time to craft narratives, prepare rebuttals, and potentially pressure other witnesses. Every day of delay is a day the public’s memory fades and political pressures can be brought to bear.”
However, Carrim’s legal team maintains the request was made in good faith. “Our client is committed to appearing before the Commission and answering all questions truthfully,” stated attorney Phasha. “To do so effectively, we must be given a fair opportunity to review the evidence that will be put to him. Rushing this process would serve no one’s interest, least of all the pursuit of truth.”
Commission Under Pressure to Maintain Momentum
The postponement places additional pressure on the Commission’s tight schedule as it works toward compiling its final report. The delay of a witness of Carrim’s stature risks slowing the inquiry’s momentum at a crucial phase, especially following other high-profile and explosive testimonies.
All eyes will now be on the first week of March. Carrim’s appearance promises to be a defining moment, testing both the Commission’s evidentiary strength and its ability to extract clear answers from a politically connected witness adept at navigating complex systems. The two-day hearing is poised to either unravel a critical thread in the web of alleged state corruption or demonstrate the formidable challenges of holding powerful networks to account.
About The Author
