In a ruling that underscores the gravity of allegations reaching into the highest echelons of the judiciary, Bhekumuzi Mike Sandlana, the leader of a prominent faction within the powerful International Pentecostal Holiness Church (IPHC), has been denied bail. The decision was handed down by the Pretoria Specialised Commercial Crimes Court, which found that the state successfully proved Sandlana posed a substantial flight risk, given his considerable resources, international connections, and the severe nature of the charges against him.
The case centers on explosive allegations that Sandlana attempted to corrupt the course of justice by offering a bribe to Pretoria High Court Judge Priscilla Madiba. The specifics of the alleged bribe have not been fully detailed in open court, but it is understood to be linked to ongoing, high-stakes litigation or internal church disputes with significant financial implications. The case is being prosecuted by the National Prosecuting Authority’s Investigating Directorate (ID), a unit dedicated to complex corruption and state capture cases, signaling the seriousness with which authorities are treating the attempt to allegedly compromise a sitting judge.
During the bail hearing, the state argued vehemently against Sandlana’s release. Prosecutors presented evidence suggesting he had access to substantial financial means through the church’s vast network and holdings, which could easily facilitate an escape from South African jurisdiction. They further contended that his influence over a large congregation could intimidate witnesses or otherwise interfere with the administration of justice. The charge itself—corruption linked to the judiciary—carries a heavy mandatory minimum sentence upon conviction, providing a powerful motive to flee.
Sandlana’s defense team argued for his release under strict conditions, emphasizing his roots in the community, his role as a spiritual leader, and his willingness to surrender all travel documents. They maintained that he was not a flight risk and intended to vigorously contest the charges to clear his name. However, Magistrate Emmanuel Magampa found the state’s arguments more persuasive, agreeing that the combination of the serious charge, Sandlana’s profile, and the potential consequences created an undeniable risk.
The ruling sends shockwaves through two powerful spheres: the religious community and the judiciary. The IPHC, one of South Africa’s largest African Independent Churches with millions of members and vast financial assets, has been plagued by leadership battles and factionalism since the death of its former leader, Glayton Modise. Sandlana leads one of the contending factions, and this legal battle adds a new layer of turmoil to the church’s internal strife, potentially influencing the struggle for control and legitimacy.
For the judiciary, the case is a stark reminder of the persistent threats to its independence and integrity. An alleged attempt to bribe a High Court judge strikes at the very heart of the rule of law. The denial of bail reflects the court’s commitment to treating such alleged offenses with the utmost severity and sending a clear deterrent message.
Sandlana will remain in custody until his next court appearance, where a trial date is expected to be set. The case, State vs. Bhekumuzi Mike Sandlana, is poised to become a landmark legal and religious drama, scrutinizing the intersection of faith, power, money, and justice in South Africa.
About The Author
